2008 Wilshire Award for Metadata Best Practices
Co-Sponsored by TDAN.com - The Data Administration Newsletter
Wilshire Conferences and TDAN.com are pleased to announce that submissions are now being accepted for the fifth annual "Wilshire Award" for Best Practices in Metadata management. The award is given to a corporate data organization to recognize business value, innovation, and excellence in design and/or implementation of meta data as a critical component in IT and business success. |
PROPOSAL GUIDELINES
AND CONDITIONS
| 1. |
Submissions are due by May 31, 2008. Only one nomination per organization. |
| 2. |
The nominated implementation must have been in production for a minimum of 12 months. Prototypes and just-completed projects will not be considered. Previous Wilshire Award winners are not eligible. |
| 3. |
Submissions must be made in Microsoft Word. Typical length is likely to be in the range of 2500-4000 words (as counted by Word) and not to exceed 5 MB total file size (including any graphs or images). |
| 4. |
All submissions become the property of Wilshire Conferences, Inc. and may be used in part or full by Wilshire for promotional and/or educational purposes. |
| 5. |
The winning organization agrees to be the subject of an interview by Robert Seiner of TDAN.com, and to be published by TDAN.com. |
| 6. |
We will honor specific confidentiality requests and refrain from making certain information public, however confidential information must be specifically identified and limited to no more than 15% of the overall submission. |
| 7. |
A representative of the nominee organization must be available for a telephone interview with the judges, if necessary, between the dates of May 31 and June 30, 2008. |
| 8. |
Finalists will be notified on or before June 30, 2008. The winner will be announced by July 31 and the award will be formally presented at the next Wilshire Meta-Data Conference. The winner will be invited to present a case study of their metadata implementation and will receive an expense-paid trip to the conference to make their presentation. |
| 9. |
Please send final submission as a Word document (may be zipped) via e-mail to tony@wilshireconferences.com. All finalists will be contacted to verify the accuracy of the entries. Questions? Contact Tony Shaw at Wilshire conferences(310) 477-4475, ext. 102. |
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:
| 1. |
Nominee Information: Provide the full corporate name, address, telephone, email and Web address for the organization being nominated for the Best Practices Award entry. Make sure to include the Individual(s) at the nominee organization who is to be contacted regarding the nomination and/or submission (include name, title, telephone, e-mail). This should be the person who will respond to questions and be interviewed by the judges if chosen as a finalist. You may also provide an alternate contact if you wish.
|
| 2. |
Please provide a statement that acknowledges you acceptance of the Submission
Conditions as outlined above. |
| 3. |
Please answer the following questions. Keep your responses concise
please. |
SPONSORSHIP, PLANNING & FRAMEWORK
| • |
Describe your meta-data program planning process, when the program started, where in the organization the program resides (business and/or technical areas) and who is ultimately responsible for delivering value. |
| • |
Describe the
phases of the program, when you went "live" with your meta-data program, and whether or not your program aligns with an industry standard framework including ITIL, Zachman, CWM, … others. |
| • |
Describe the level of management sponsorship, promotion, enforcement and the business drivers of your meta-data program. |
| • |
Describe the program's business and technical goals and objectives, how these goals and objectives were decided upon, and the level to which these goals and objectives have been achieved. |
BUSINESS REQUIREMENTS & META-DATA SELECTION / TAXONOMY
| • |
Describe the business and technical meta-data that is being managed by your program (include meta-data supporting the management of structured and unstructured data if applicable). |
| • |
Describe the meta-data requirements gathering process, who was involved in that process and how that specific meta-data was selected. |
ARCHITECTURE – INTEGRATION & CHANGE
MANAGEMENT
| • |
Describe your program's meta-data architecture (centralized, distributed, virtual, tool-based, …) |
| • |
Describe
the meta-data systems of records for each of the meta-data sources, how the meta-data is integrated, and how the meta-data is accessed utilizing this architecture. |
| • |
Describe the metadata quality assurance and change management processes and procedures for each meta-data system of record. |
| • |
Describe the relationship between your meta-data program and ancillary activities including master data management, content management, data quality/quality reporting initiatives, compliance initiatives, … others that have aligned with your program. |
| |
Please feel free to attach a graphic of your architecture in PowerPoint or Visio format |
PEOPLE – PROGRAM TEAM & META-DATA USERS
| • |
Describe the business and technical roles associated with your meta-data program, how many people participate in these roles, where they reside in the organization, and who manages their responsibilities. |
| • |
Describe the meta-data user base (both business and technical),
how many people are currently using the metadata and the areas of your organization where they are receiving the most value from the meta- data program.
|
| • |
Describe how the meta-data program is marketed and promoted internally in your organization and how accountability for the management of meta-data is applied and enforced.
|
| • |
Describe the techniques that you use to attract new meta-data users and how you assist new users to learn how to use and navigate through the metadata. |
MEASUREMENTS – PROGRAM & SUCCESS STORIES
| • |
Describe how your organization measures the success of your meta-data program, how KPIs (key performance indicators) are defined, and the meta-data program quality reporting method (balanced scorecard, six sigma, …). |
| • |
Describe your ability / attempt to define and report a financial ROI on the program, whether or not this type of reporting is required and how well this reporting has been accepted. |
METADATA DIAGRAM
| • |
Submit a diagram indicating the flow of metadata as it is collected and distributed. See this file as an example and explanation. |
EVALUATION CRITERIA:
Responses will be rated by the judges on various criteria including(but not limited to):
| • |
overall business impact/benefits |
| • |
return on objective |
| • |
measurable return on investment |
| • |
scale of the solution (i.e. enterprise, business unit) |
| • |
number and breadth of applications served by the solution |
| • |
length of time the solution has been in place |
| • |
innovative problem solving |
| • |
how well the submission addresses the questions asked above |
Please send your final submission as a Word document (may be zipped) via e-mail to tony@wilshireconferences.com. All finalists will be contacted to verify the accuracy of the entries. |
Questions? Contact Tony Shaw at Wilshire conferences (310)
477-4475, ext. 102. |
|
|