CALL
FOR SUBMISSIONS & ENTRY GUIDELINES
Wilshire
Award for Metadata Best Practices
Co-Sponsored
by TDAN.com - The Data Administration Newsletter
Wilshire
Conferences and TDAN.com are pleased to announce that submissions
are now being accepted for the fourth annual "Wilshire
Award" for Best Practices in Metadata management. The
award is given to a corporate data organization to recognize
business value, innovation, and excellence in design and/or
implementation of meta data as a critical component in IT
and business success. |
PROPOSAL GUIDELINES
AND CONDITIONS
| 1. |
Submissions are
due by September 22, 2006. Only one nomination per organization. |
| 2. |
The nominated implementation must have been in production
for a minimum of 12 months. Prototypes and just-completed projects
will not be considered. Previous Wilshire Award winners are
not eligible. |
| 3. |
Submissions must be made in Microsoft Word. Typical length
is likely to be in the range of 2500-4000 words (as counted
by Word) and not to exceed 5 MB total file size (including
any graphs or images). |
| 4. |
All submissions become the property of Wilshire Conferences,
Inc. and may be used in part or full by Wilshire for promotional
and/or educational purposes. |
| 5. |
The winning organization agrees to be the subject of an interview
by Robert Seiner of TDAN.com, and to be published by TDAN.com. |
| 6. |
We will honor specific confidentiality requests and refrain
from making certain information public, however confidential
information must be specifically identified and limited to
no more than 15% of the overall submission. |
| 7. |
A representative
of the nominee organization must be available for a telephone
interview with the judges, if necessary, between the dates of
September 22 and October 10, 2006. |
| 8. |
Finalists will
be notified on or before October 10, 2006. The winner will be
announced by October 31 and the award will be formally presented
at the next Wilshire Meta-Data Conference, scheduled for March
4-8, 2007, in Boston, Massachusetts. The winner will be invited
to present a case study of their metadata implementation and
will receive an expense-paid trip to Boston to make their presentation. |
| 9. |
Please send final submission as a Word document
(may be zipped) via e-mail to tony@wilshireconferences.com.
All finalists will be contacted to verify the accuracy of the
entries. Questions? Contact Tony Shaw at Wilshire conferences
(310) 477-4475, ext. 102. |
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:
| 1. |
Nominee Information: Provide the full corporate name,
address, telephone, email and Web address for the organization
being nominated for the Best Practices Award entry. Make
sure to include the Individual(s) at the nominee organization
who is to be contacted regarding the nomination and/or submission
(include name, title, telephone, e-mail). This should be
the person who will respond to questions and be interviewed
by the judges if chosen as a finalist. You may also provide
an alternate contact if you wish.
|
| 2. |
Please provide
a statement that acknowledges you acceptance of the Submission
Conditions as outlined above. |
3. |
Please
answer the following questions. Keep your responses concise
please. |
SPONSORSHIP, PLANNING & FRAMEWORK
| • |
Describe your meta-data program planning process, when
the program started, where in the organization the program
resides (business and/or technical areas) and who is ultimately
responsible for delivering value. |
| • |
Describe the
phases of the program, when you went "live" with
your meta-data program, and whether or not your program aligns
with an industry standard framework including ITIL, Zachman,
CWM, … others. |
| • |
Describe
the level of management sponsorship, promotion, enforcement
and the business drivers of your meta-data program. |
| • |
Describe
the program's business and technical goals and objectives,
how these goals and objectives were decided upon, and the
level to which these goals and objectives have been achieved. |
BUSINESS REQUIREMENTS & META-DATA
SELECTION / TAXONOMY
| • |
Describe the business and technical
meta-data that is being managed by your program (include
meta-data supporting the management of structured and unstructured
data if applicable). |
| • |
Describe the meta-data requirements gathering process,
who was involved in that process and how that specific meta-data
was selected. |
ARCHITECTURE – INTEGRATION & CHANGE
MANAGEMENT
| • |
Describe your program's meta-data architecture
(centralized, distributed, virtual, tool-based, …) |
| • |
Describe
the meta-data systems of records for each of the meta-data
sources, how the meta-data is integrated, and how the meta-data
is accessed utilizing this architecture. |
| • |
Describe
the metadata quality assurance and change management processes
and procedures for each meta-data system of record. |
| • |
Describe the relationship between your meta-data
program and ancillary activities including master data management,
content management, data quality/quality reporting initiatives,
compliance initiatives, … others that have aligned
with your program. |
| |
Please feel free to attach a graphic of your architecture
in PowerPoint or Visio format |
PEOPLE – PROGRAM TEAM & META-DATA
USERS
| • |
Describe
the business and technical roles associated with your meta-data
program, how many people participate in these roles, where
they reside in the organization, and who manages their responsibilities. |
| • |
Describe
the meta-data user base (both business and technical),
how many people are currently using the metadata and the
areas of your organization where they are receiving the
most value from the meta-
data program.
|
| • |
Describe
how the meta-data program is marketed and promoted internally
in your organization and how accountability for the management
of meta-data is applied and enforced.
|
| • |
Describe
the techniques that you use to attract new meta-data users
and how you assist new users to learn how to use and navigate
through the metadata. |
MEASUREMENTS – PROGRAM & SUCCESS
STORIES
| • |
Describe
how your organization measures the success of your meta-data
program, how KPIs (key performance indicators) are defined,
and the meta-data program quality reporting method (balanced
scorecard, six sigma, …). |
| • |
Describe your ability / attempt to define and report a financial
ROI on the program, whether or not this type of reporting is
required and how well this reporting has been accepted. |
EVALUATION
CRITERIA:
Responses will be rated by the
judges on various criteria including(but not limited to):
| - |
overall
business impact/benefits |
| - |
return
on objective |
| - |
measurable return on investment
|
| - |
scale
of the solution (i.e. enterprise, business unit) |
| - |
number
and breadth of applications served by the solution |
| - |
length
of time the solution has been in place |
| - |
innovative problem solving |
| - |
how
well the submission addresses the questions asked above |
Please
send your final submission as a Word document (may be zipped)
via e-mail to tony@wilshireconferences.com. All finalists
will be contacted to verify the accuracy of the entries. |
Questions? Contact Tony Shaw at Wilshire conferences (310)
477-4475, ext. 102. |
|
|